Built by somebody who spent twenty years being the person who checks

Nimavera builds software for obligations with a date on them. Tracecanon turns recorded evidence into cited answers and says insufficient evidence rather than guessing. Reachcanon scans for accessibility conformance and has no result called pass — the word does not appear in its database. Scopecanon will never tell you that you comply.

That is not three separate scruples. It is one idea pointed at three obligations: software can show what is engaged and what evidence exists, and cannot reach the legal conclusion. Anybody can build the scanner. The refusal is what makes the rest of the report worth believing.

Almost everyone building for the AI Act is building for providers — the labs and vendors with a model at the centre of the product. That is the glamorous half, and the small one.

Article 26 puts its own duties on the company that merely uses an AI system. They far outnumber the companies that build AI. They have budgets and auditors, and almost none of them know they are in scope, because nobody inside them decided anything — a vendor shipped a feature.

By one person, directing AI models on a short leash. The method excuses nothing: the obligation rules are a pure function covered by tests, the matcher is deliberately conservative because one false positive destroys a register’s credibility, and every page is checked across four viewports in both themes before it ships.

Scopecanon is operated by Nimavera Inc. (in formation). Wherever something is not yet true, this site says so.